Friday, 16 October 2015 00:00

VMware or Microsoft? Quick Comparison between vSphere 5.5 and Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V

Rate this item
(0 votes)

In lots of customer discussions, the one thing that comes out often - How does Microsoft Virtualization stcak ( Hyper-V & System Center 2012 R2) compares with VMWare virtulization stack (vSphere 5.5 Enterprise Plus + vCenter Server 5.5). I have tried focus on real-world perspective based on my experience implementing both solutions in the field throughout my career. In this article, I’ll provide a summarized comparison of the feature sets provided by each of these latest releases using the currently available public information from both Microsoft and VMware as of this article’s publication date for additional reference.

How to compare?

Rather than simply comparing feature-by-feature using just simple check-marks in each category, I’ll try to provide as much detail as possible for you to intelligently compare each area. As I’m sure you’ve heard before, sometimes the “devil is in the details”.

For each comparison area, I’ll rate the related capabilities with the following color coded rankings:

  • Supported – Fully supported without any additional products or licenses
  • Limited Support – Significant limitations when using related feature, or limitations in comparison to the competing solution represented
  • Not Supported – Not supported at all or without the addition of other product licensing costs

In this article, I’ve organized the comparison into the following sections:

  • Licensing
  • Virtualization Scalability
  • VM Portability, High Availability and Disaster Recovery
  • Storage
  • Networking
  • Guest Operating Systems

Are you keeping score at home?

Of course, not all of the features and capabilities presented in the summary below may be important to you. As you review the comparison summary of each section, just make a note of the particular features that you're likely to use in your environment. When you're done, tally up the Green ratings in each column to determine which platform achieves a better score in meeting the needs of your organization.

Here we go…

Licensing: At-A-Glance

Microsoft

Windows Server 2012 R2 + System Center 2012 R2 Datacenter Editions

VMware

vSphere 5.5 Enterprise Plus + vCenter Server 5.5

Notes

# of Physical CPUs per License 2 1

With Microsoft, each Datacenter Edition license provides licensing for up to 2 physical CPUs per Host. Additional licenses can be “stacked” if more than 2 physical CPUs are present.

With VMware, a vSphere 5.5 Enterprise Plus license must be purchased for each physical CPU. This difference in CPU licensing is one of the factors that can contribute to increased licensing costs. In addition, a minimum of one license of vCenter Server 5.5 is required for vSphere deployments.

# of Managed OSE’s per License Unlimited Unlimited Both solutions provide the ability to manage an unlimited number of Operating System Environments per licensed Host.
# of Windows Server VM Licenses per Host Unlimited 0

With VMware, Windows Server VM licenses must still be purchased separately. In environments virtualizing Windows Server workloads, this can contribute to a higher overall cost when virtualizing with VMware.

VMware does include licenses for an unlimited # of VMs running SUSE Linux Enterprise Server per Host.

Includes Anti-virus / Anti-malware protection Yes - System Center Endpoint Protection agents included for both Host and VMs with System Center 2012 R2 Yes - vShield Endpoint Protection which deploys as EPSEC thin agent in each VM + separate virtual appliance.
Includes full SQL Database Server licenses for management databases Yes - Includes all needed database server licensing to manage up to 1,000 hosts and 25,000 VMs per management server. No - Must purchase additional database server licenses to scale beyond managing 100 hosts and 3,000 VMs with vCenter Server Appliance. VMware licensing includes an internal vPostgres database that supports managing up to 100 hosts and 3,000 VMs via vCenter Server Appliance. See VMware vSphere 5.5 Configuration Maximums for details.
Includes licensing for Enterprise Operations Monitoring and Management of hosts, guest VMs and application workloads running within VMs. Yes - Included in System Center 2012 R2 No – Operations Monitoring and Management requires separate license for vCenter Operations Manager or upgrade to vSphere with Operations Management
Includes licensing for Private Cloud Management capabilities – pooled resources, self-service, delegation, automation, elasticity, chargeback/showback Yes - Included in System Center 2012 R2 No – Private Cloud Management capabilities require additional cost of VMware vCloud Suite.
Includes management tools for provisioning and managing VDI solutions for virtualized Windows desktops. Yes - Included in the RDS role of Windows Server 2012. No - VDI management requires additional cost of VMware Horizon View.
Includes web-based management console Yes – Included in System Center 2012 App Controller using web browsers supporting Silverlight 5, and free Windows Azure Pack for multi-tenant self-service VM management using web browsers supporting HTML5/JavaScript. Yes - Included in vSphere Web Client using IE 8,9,10, Firefox and Chrome.

Virtualization Scalability: At-a-Glance

Microsoft

Windows Server 2012 R2 + System Center 2012 R2 Datacenter Editions

VMware

vSphere 5.5 Enterprise Plus + vCenter Server 5.5

Notes

Maximum # of Logical Processors per Host 320 320 With vSphere 5.5 Enterprise Plus, VMware has “caught up” to Microsoft in terms of Maximum # of Logical Processors supported per Host.
Maximum Physical RAM per Host 4TB 4TB With vSphere 5.5 Enterprise Plus, VMware has “caught up” to Microsoft in terms of Maximum Physical RAM supported per Host.
Maximum Active VMs per Host 1,024 512
Maximum Virtual CPUs per VM 64 64 When using VMware FT, only 1 Virtual CPU per VM can be used.
Hot-Adjust Virtual CPU Resources to VM Yes - Hyper-V provides the ability to increase and decrease Virtual Machine limits for processor resources on running VMs. Yes - Can Hot-Add virtual CPUs for running VMs on selected Guest Operating Systems and adjust Limits/Shares for CPU resources.

VMware Hot-Add CPU feature requires supported Guest Operating System. Check VMware Compatibility Guide for details.

VMware Hot-Add CPU feature not supported when using VMware FT

Maximum Virtual RAM per VM 1TB 1TB When using VMware FT, only 64GB of Virtual RAM per VM can be used.
Hot-Add Virtual RAM to VM Yes (Dynamic Memory) Yes Requires supported Guest Operating System.
Dynamic Memory Management Yes (Dynamic Memory) Yes (Memory Ballooning ) Note that memory overcommit is not supported for VMs that are configured as an MSCS VM Guest Cluster . VMware vSphere 5.5 also supports another memory technique: Transparent Page Sharing(TPS). While TPS was useful in the past on legacy server hardware platforms and operating systems, it is no longer effective in many environments due to modern servers and operating systems supporting Large Memory Pages (LMP) for improved memory performance.
Guest NUMA Support Yes Yes NUMA = Non-Uniform Memory Access. Guest NUMA support is particularly important for scalability when virtualizing large multi-vCPU VMs on Hosts with a large number of physical processors.
Maximum # of physical Hosts per Cluster 64 32
Maximum # of VMs per Cluster 8,000 4,000
Virtual Machine Snapshots Yes - Up to 50 snapshots per VM are supported.

Yes - Up to 32 snapshots per VM chain are supported, but VMware only recommends 2-to-3.

In addition, VM Snapshots are not supported for VMs using an iSCSI initiator.

Integrated Application Load Balancing for Scaling-Out Application Tiers Yes - via System Center 2012 R2 VMM No – Requires additional purchase of vCloud Network and Security (vCNS) or vCloud Suite.
Bare metal deployment of new Hypervisor hosts and clusters Yess - via System Center 2012 R2 VMM Yes - VMware Auto Deploy and Host Profiles supports bare metal deployment of new hosts into an existing cluster, but does not support bare metal deployment of new clusters.
Bare metal deployment of new Storage hosts and clusters Yess - via System Center 2012 R2 VMM No
Bare metal deployment of new Storage hosts and clusters Yes - via System Center 2012 R2 VMM No
Manage GPU Virtualization for Advanced VDI Graphics Yes - Server GPUs can be virtualized and pooled across VDI VMs via RemoteFX and native VDI management features in RDS role. Yes - via vDGA and vSGA features, but requires separate purchase of VMware Horizon View to manage VDI desktop pools.
Virtualization of USB devices Yes - Client USB devices can be passed to VMs via Remote Desktop connections. Direct redirection of USB storage from Host possible with Windows-to-Go certified devices. Direct redirection of other USB devices possible with third-party solutions. Yes - via USB Pass-through support.
Boot from SAN Yes- can leverage included iSCSI Target Server or 3rd party iSCSI / FC storage arrays using software or hardware boot providers. Yes - can leverage 3rd party iSCSI / FC storage arrays using software or hardware boot providers.

In Summary

As you can see, both Microsoft and VMware Virtualization solutions offer lots of enterprise-grade virtualization features. Hopefully this comparison was useful to you in more granularly evaluating each platform for your environment.

Reference : http://blogs.technet.com/b/pracheta/archive/2014/01/22/vmware-or-microsoft-quick-comparison-between-vsphere-5-5-and-windows-server-2012-r2-hyper-v.aspx

Last modified on Friday, 16 October 2015 13:08
Data Recovery Expert

Viktor S., Ph.D. (Electrical/Computer Engineering), was hired by DataRecoup, the international data recovery corporation, in 2012. Promoted to Engineering Senior Manager in 2010 and then to his current position, as C.I.O. of DataRecoup, in 2014. Responsible for the management of critical, high-priority RAID data recovery cases and the application of his expert, comprehensive knowledge in database data retrieval. He is also responsible for planning and implementing SEO/SEM and other internet-based marketing strategies. Currently, Viktor S., Ph.D., is focusing on the further development and expansion of DataRecoup’s major internet marketing campaign for their already successful proprietary software application “Data Recovery for Windows” (an application which he developed).

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Get Help Now

Thank you for contacting us.
Your Private Investigator will call you shortly.